Photoshop :: Multi Resize
Nov 3, 2004if there is a way to apply an image resize to multiple images, so i don't have to select each pic past it into a smaller canvas and then resize it to fit,
View 4 Repliesif there is a way to apply an image resize to multiple images, so i don't have to select each pic past it into a smaller canvas and then resize it to fit,
View 4 RepliesWhen I select multiple fonts and try to change the font size from let's say 14pt to 24pt, it doesn't change them all to the same point size.
It says it did, but when you select the text individually and check the point size, they'll be arbitrary numbers like 15.6, 18.2, 24.1, etc. The only way I can change font size – accurately - is to individually select each text layer one-by-one.
It has come to my attention that the new drag-resize feature only changes the master diameter of the brush but leaves the dual-brush diameter intact. It is the only shortcut that does this resizing improperly.
I would like to know if everyone else experiences the same problem. Is it a bug or is this way of resizing intended?
I mainly do digital paintings and this small bug makes the feature useless for me. I hope that it will be fixed at least in cs5.
In previous versions I have been able to resize the canvas and then resize the image. For example resize the canvas to 250px x 250 px. Then resize the image to the same.
Here is the process I am using:
Duplicate the layer and then hide it. Resize the canvas (Image > Canvas Size) to 250px x 250 px. Un-hide the layer and then resize the image (Image > Image Size). When I go into Image>Image Size it says that the image is already 250px x 250px. However if I try to transform the scale the image is the original size and not 250px x 250px
The reason for needing this is I resize image size (in bulk) and the canvas size using the batch process (file>automate>batch) and actions. I loaded the actions file I used in previous versions, but that did not work correctly. I then went in to do this manually and got the same results.
I have just been trying to resize some images on the latest version - 3.510.4297.28964 - and I have typed the measurements that I wanted into the print size fields on the resize dialogue. The actual sizes the program resizes the images to differ though - some look to be about right, whereas some come out much larger, but they all show the dimensions that I inserted in the canvas size box.
I'm sure I've done this before and this hasn't happened?
I need to get a multi-layered image into another multi-layered image keeping all the layers/effects of both images. Can't seem to just copy/paste and I don't seen import function.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe received a jpg file that seems to gave 2 pages when you view it in Bridge.
When we open the file in Photoshop or link it in Indesign or Illustrator we only see the 1st page or view of the file.
I was very surprised to see this in Bridge, as far as I know it is not possible to even make a multi page jpg file.
Does Photoshop CC support multi GPU like Cinema 4D? Would be nice to read a "Yes"
View 3 Replies View RelatedOkay, well I'm not really new to photoshop, like I can put pictures together and whatnot, but I was wondering how to separate Multi Burst photos. When I take them on my camera it's like they're all separate pictures, but on the computer it ends up becoming one big picture.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI had no significant problem of creating a panorama picture by stitching HORIZONTALLY many (up to 35) pictures. Is PS capable of automatically stitching vertically too? The idea is to accomplish multi-raw panorama. That is, if in addition to a wide view, I want also the panoramic picture cover significant hight. The idea is to sweep the horizon at a certain vertical angle.
Then, sweep at a lower level and creating a panoramic view of both sweeps. If not fully automatic, then create a photomerge and create 2 panoramic picture. Then automatically stitch the two panoramas vertically.
I'm printing 10 same things on A4. But now I'm printing them 10 times plus back side, then it's 20 times, annoying much. How can I set photoshop(or what else?) to copy my one image like 10 times vertically automatically when printing. If I edit the one original image, I could just print it 10x once?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI discovered this "new" function on my camera today (just bought it recently and I'm still just playing around with it). A thingy called Multi-Shot where the camera takes 16 pictures in about 2 or 3 seconds and then makes it into a single image. Where you can see all the frames, which end up at a resolution of about 400*300 on the 7mp total resolution.
Is there any way possible to make photoshop automatically take my 16-pic multishot picture, take every single frame, crop it and save it as a separate image file? So I end up with 16 different pictures instead of one containing all the frames?
If i like to resize (no transformation) my textarea in Photoshop CS3 on my Q6600 Quadcore I always get a font size of --21474836,, Px ... seems that there goes something wrong while calulating... But for what.. Text size should stay as is...
Also I get some strange image resizing errors... If I resize an image I get some kind of grid in it where are only transparent pixels... (changing transformation method to smooth solved the problem for now) What is wrong with PS ... Kind of strange things also happen in ID and Acrobat...?
Ok I thought it could be a float problem with my multicore so I opened the taskmanager and set Photoshop to only use CPU 2, 3 and 4... And everything seems to be ok...
Always setting the CPU cores in the taskmanager wouldn't be the best i can imagine.
I am trying to create an action that would open a muli-page PDF file, select all the pages and place each page on its own layer, in the same Photoshop document.
Right now, it makes a new document in Photoshop of each page? Is there anyway to do this? With or without making an action?
I brought acer t232hl bmidz for Photoshop CC, so I can use my finger on canvas.. Find out that I cannot paint on canvas at all... Weird that adobe in design and illustrate working fine with multi touchscreen.. I am use window 8.
Is there any plug in or bug fixed for this problem?
What is the term for a multicolor fringe around an edge..how do you get rid of it
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an image that uses about 20 different colors (there are 2 colors that dominate the image). I want to reduce the image to just those 2 main colors. How can I do that in Photoshop CS2 or Illustrator CS2?
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to configure more than one monitor on my system for use with photoshop? I am presently working on a laptop and would like to add a large widescreen to view pixel information (keeping palettes on my laptop display).
View 4 Replies View Relatedhow to make multi colored backgrounds?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI add one ore two duplicate layers to the background layer. Then I add multiple adjustment layers (e.g., Hue/Sat; Brightness, Cotrast,etc.). Then I want to use the Clone Stamp to take something off of the background. The only way I am able to remove an item with the clone stamp is to remove it from the background and the duplicate layers ONE LAYER AT A TIME. Of course, I could always remove the object before I make the dups, but is there anyway to do this by going to any ONE layer and removing the object (using the Clone Stamp or any other tool)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have created 8 A4-sized PSD documents in Photoshop CS3 and I would like to create a single PDF document with 8 pages.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI like to crop a scan of newspaper article to a multi edge shape (or a big rectangular on the left next to a small one right bottom). Or I want to get ride of the left upper rectangular. How do I do that in CS6?
View 8 Replies View Relatedhow to enable Windows multi touch. These seem like fairly basic features now days but I can't seem to find a setting to turn them on?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently purchased a dual Xeon 3.0Ghz Quad-core Dell T7400 Precision Workstation (used) with 32GB of RAM.
I ran some testing before moving all of my software to the new machine, and it very quickly became clear that the system had some stability issues which I eventually attributed to the discovery that the 2 processors were not a matched pair (different builds and stepping levels). My first thought was to remove the older one and use the system with a single processor before finding a match for that remaining processor and installing it.
But then it occurred to me that I might also have to reinstall my OS (Windows 7 Ultimate), Creative Suite DP5 and all (or some) of my other software after installing that second processor, since both Windows and Photoshop check for the number of processors at installation and so will origianlly be set up to run on a single processor machine, not a dual.
I like to run as clean a system as possible (NO unnecessary software, etc.), so besides the unpleasant prospect of the double investment of time (installation, uninstallation and then reinstallation of the OS and 10 -15 other applications), I'm also concerned about junk that might be left over, either in the registry or elsewhere, after all of that installing, uninstalling and reinstalling.
for optimal future use (and Photoshop CS5 is probably 80+% of what I'll do on this workstation) should I: Go ahead and install the OS, CS5 and other software and start to use the new (single processor) computer now and then just add the second processor when I find one at a decent price, orKeep using my current workstation until I have a matched pair of processors for the new machine. Then, AFTER installing that matched pair, install the OS and application software and begin to use the new machine.
I am anxious to switch to the new machine and jump from 4GB of RAM to 32GB, but if starting with a single processor and then adding a second one in a week or a month will cost me either stability or performance down the road, it's not worth it.
I have like 50 PSD files that I need to convert into jpeg - is there a way of doing it in one shop, having all the PSD files converted to jpeg?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have several Photoshop images with about 35 layers, is there a way I can automatically save each layers as a separate file?
View 3 Replies View RelatedFor a long time I have been struggling to find a good workflow for what I would call "multi channel color separation". What I want is to reduce a full color RGB image into an image with only a limited number (e.g. 5-8) well-chosen colors, for instance to use as set of masks for screen print. (I'd also like to use this as an effect in itself, mimicking a typical 'screen print' or 'litho' effect on an inkjet print)
The idea is to create a set of monochrome layers or spot color channels. Colors are to be selected by myself (so not necessarily RGB or CMYK). Each channel/layer has to be a continuous tone that I transform myself into a dedicated half tone screen (e.g. with the Andromeda screen filter).
Till sofar it is clear to me. My issue is: How to separate the image in the predefined set of colors?
I can not just select a color range: I can adjust a "tolerance" but that is too general. I need the pixels of with a specific hue but with the full range of lightness (e.g. all the purple pixels that range from dark/medium purple to very light purple). The dark colors can be made dark with a black channel. I'm not sure how to deal with the saturation range.
An approach that gives sometimes a result that is to some extent acceptable is to transfer from RGB mode to an Indexed Color mode and use a custom palette. However, this does not give much control on the halftone screening process.
I envision for instance an approach of filling a layer with a solid given color, select in one way or another only those parts that correspond to the original image and subtract that layer somehow from the image. This process is then to be repeated for each color. Up till now I have not been able to figure the right options to do this. But maybe there is a better way to do it.
One final wish: it would be great if the process can take into account that some layers in the final print are (semi-)transparent. In my opinion this would exclude just selecting a color and deleting de pixels.
Trying to change the blue color in this abstract image (see image) to a much darker green (pantone 561) Any way to do this easily? I am not coming to close to this new darker green color.
View 3 Replies View RelatedAt tut "Multi-Layered Ring effect", step 4 we find this paragraph:
"Rename this channel to bevel. Once you have renamed the channel to bevel go to Filter/Blur/Guassian Blur and choose a value of 8. Then Guassian Blur it again with a value of 5, and one more time with a value of 1."
Why can't we put a bigger value to the gaussian blur effect, instead of repeating it three times with differents values? If i put 14 for the Gaussian value once, isn't it return with the same effect?
I am trying to use the flip canvass vertical command with the free transform tool to create a reflection below a harsichord with seven legs. I understand the technique with simple objects; however I fail to see how a complex object such as this can be given a reflection using this method.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am considering getting a new system to use for my photo processing applications. I see that Adobe has releases LR v2.0 which supports 64 bit OS and has announced that CS4, when ever it is released will also support 64 bits, well at least for Windows. This being the case, switching to Vista 64 seems to be the way to go. BUT what about the processor? The choices seem to be a quad core version from either Intel or AMD or moving higher, a Intel Xeon processor. This gives me two more choices, use two 5100 series processors for a total of four cores or go up to two 5400 series processors for a total of eight cores. The 5100 series approach seems to use less power that the 5400's and can be clocked faster. Also, last year I had the opportunity to quickly run a bench mark with CS3 on a Dell dual Xeon workstation running Windows XP 32 bit OS. It appeared that the the system only managed to make use of only 4 of the 8 processors.
I have done a fair amount of searching and have not found any good answers to the question of which processor configuration will give the best performance. To keep this discussion reasonable I would like to limit it to one quad core processor vs. two dual core Xeons vs. two quad core Xeons.