Lightroom :: When Will Adobe LR5 Support Fujifilm XT1
Mar 22, 2014When will Adobe LR5 support Fujifilm XT1?
View 4 RepliesWhen will Adobe LR5 support Fujifilm XT1?
View 4 RepliesDoes pse11 support xpro1 raw files ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedThis will allow conversion of Fujifilm XE-2 raw to dng?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been trying to get the program to recognize the my camera. Adobe help says my camera is supported, but there is no information as to the specific steps that should be taken to set up tethering to a PC.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've got a few crash issues with my newly purchased Adobe software and can't find any tech support. What's the best method for finding help from Adobe?
Tried the online method with absolutely no response, tried the telephone and got sent to India with someone who I found impossible to understand (I don't speak Indian). I sure do like Adobe products when they work, but it doesn't seem to work very often for me.
The camera is listed as supported by L/r 5.2 but I am informed the RAW files can not be loaded.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have read a lot of comments about the quality of output for Fujifilm X raw files, and how poor it is. When compared with Canon raw file processing I agree that the standards for X trans raw files are significantly under par. I would like to know if adobe are redeveloping their support of fujifilm support for these formats? I'm not looking to snipe at adobe. Just want some honest answers so I can make some decisions as I'm now an exclusively X user.
View 1 Replies View RelatedFirst of all, I'm very happy the new version of Lightroom handles FujiFilm X-E1 RAW (RAF) files fast and efficiently.
But I have a feeling the colours aren't quite right. The X-E1, and its brothers, are known for their incredible colour reproduction and wide dynamic range in a compact format. When shooting native JPEG's with, or without shadow compensation settings in the camera, the resulting JPEG files has a clear FujiFilm identity. The colours and luma and are very even all the way from the shadows to the highlights. But when loading a RAW (RAF) file into Lightroom (v4.4) the colours, still untouched, aren't at all the same, and not the luma either. Shadows are harsher, the skin tones and most colours actually are a tiny bit off. Overall I would urge you to study this in detail and give us an optional Camera Calibration profile or something, that will give FujiFilm justice here.
Does this make any sense to you, or am I just being picky here?
Does Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0 allow you to enlarge .jpg files?
View 3 Replies View RelatedLightroom 4 is constantly put down as being very poor at rendering Fujifilm X Trans RAW files. Fujifilm claims to have assisted Adobe with this new sensor design yet LR falls down hard. Why is that? Will it get better or are we stuck with what LR can do now?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm using a Fuji X100S since last week (after many years of Nikon through D200, D300, D700 and now D800, and also experimenting with Olympus' OM-D and a Sony RX100).
The Fuji makes awesome pictures, super sharp, especially in the center, has fantastic low light performance and since it looks great and is much smaller but still features a view finder I find myself using it much more than the big though excellent D800.
However, in terms of color reproduction (I'm testing this by shooting out of the window and then comparing the results after conversion of the raw images in LR 4.4) I found the color cast of the Fuji images lacking. Whilst the Nikon raw images (either when applying the Adobe Standard or the preferred Neutral in Camera calibration settings) have a balanced green/red tint and a mostly accurate WB in >90% of the images, I find myself correcting almost 100% of the Fuji images by dialing down the red tint and the dialing up the temperature (ie, toward warmer temperatures). Interestingly, while also the JPEGs coming out of the Fuji look the same (ie, have a red tint and cool temperatures) - both raw and JPEG images when viewed on the small LCD on the back of the Fuji have neither red tint nor cool temperatures, they simply look "right" when compared with what I'm seeing when looking out of my window.
how to rectify this for all future imported Fuji raw images? So far, I couldn't find a setting in LR 4.4 that would automatically reduce tint and increase temperature by a set relative amount (e.g., -20% and +20%, respectively).
I'm working on Macs (iMac and Retina Macbook) running 10.8.3
They will not show up in PS. I run a Mac under Mavericks 10.9.1 with all the latest updates for ACR, LR and PSCC.
MacBook Pro early 2011.
Is it that the files are not supported yet?? In LR, the lens profile is recognized... (Fuji X100S)
Fujifilm X-Pro1 with pictures taken in RAW does not open in LT 4.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to move RAW files from a Fujifilm X-E2 camera to an iMac running OS X 10.9.1. Is Lightroom 5 compatible with these two devices?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm being a bit premature but when could we possible see support for the Olympus OM-D EM-5?The camera is getting in the hands of the consumer and would love to have LR support it
View 5 Replies View RelatedSome of the main features of Lightroom are reasons for buying it in the first place. Adobe's refusal to support this well known and highly rated camera reveals something about a business model which ignores the needs of their customers. If I buy another camera next year why should I suppose that Adobe will deign to support it?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have LR 4 and now I have bought a Canon 70D. Lightroom said it was unable to interpret the RAW files and directed me to get an update. I have updated to 4.4 and still have the same problem. How can I get my RAW files into Lightroom 4?
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes Lightroom 5.3 FULLY support Canon 70d raw?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI can't finda list of cameras that are supported in LR5. There is a list for LR4but not LR5. In particular I have three cameras that all work withtethering but I don't have any working software to use thisfacility.
Canon G10
Leica DIgilux 2
Both these cameras came with tethering software that was subsequently dissabled in software updates (Not firmware updates)
I also have the EOS-M and for reasons I don'y understand Canon won't let EOS utility operate the camera even though this functionality exists within the camera because CaptureOnesupports EOS-tethering.
I'm about to make a significant investment in GPU and monitor if LR5 supports 10-bit color.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI realize that the 60D just came out but I would love to see tether support in LR3.3. I can get it to work using a watched folder with the EOS utility but not with direct tethering.
View 17 Replies View RelatedI am interested in creating a number of HDR prints and am looking for the right software to get.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOr do I have to upgrade to LR4 to work with RAW on 5d mk3?
View 6 Replies View Relatedif Lightroom supports 10-bit color. I know it supports ProPhotoRGB and 16-bit image files.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCurrently, I don't believe Lightroom 5 supports RAW files from Olympus' new camera, the OM-D E-M10.I know it supports JPEG files.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe Canon 6D is not in the current list of supported cameras for tethering in Lightroom. When will Lightroom 4 support tethering for Canon EOS 6D?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen will tethered capture support be avaialble for the D800 and D4?
View 5 Replies View RelatedDoes LR support opengl or opencl?
Using opengl with PS CS6 and PS CC I have seem substantial speed improvements in a number of functions. However, in LR 5 it is getting slower and slower the more images I add. It will often stall/freeze or slow to a crawl. Out of sheer frustration I downloaded Capture One 7 and turned on the opengl support. I imported my entire 1.3 T of image files to C1 7. While it is not as quick as LR - when running as it should - C1 7 never slows down, never stalls, never crashes. I want to continue with LR but its stalls, freezes, slow dows and occassional crashes are killing me.
I have optimized my catalog regularly, put my catalog and previews on my SSD and the cache on a WD Velociraptor - and yet it is getting slower and slower. Both drives are less than 50% full. My images are on a 2t WD Velocirapotor raid 0 - 66% full. Otherwise my system is very quick and very stable - just LR 5 is the probem.
Win 7 pro 64 bit
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 3.3ghz
16 gb ram
By reading comments herein, one is led to believe that LR 5.3 provides tethered capture support for the Nikon D-610. Well, I have a MacBook Pro and OSX, and beg to differ. I cannot, for the life of me, get LR 5.3 to recognize my D-610.
what steps I need to take to get the software to recognize the camera?
If this camera is not supported, when will the D-610 be added? LR 5.3 already supports the 610's predecessor, the D-600; this camera had such a serious dust/sensor problem that Nikon quickly introduced the 610, which is virtually identical but without the sensor problem.
We are thinking about switching over to Lightroom, but 95% of our 60,000 images are EPS files. I recently used a trial version and it didn't seem to recognize my EPS files. Is there a way for Lightroom to acknowledge these files? Is there a plugin to download and try?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes LR 3.6 support the new Canon 5D Mark III camera? LR4 should. I don't care if the camera metadata is in LR or not. I just want to process the Mark III images in LR3.6. Can't upgrade to LR 4 because it is only 64 bit.
View 2 Replies View Related