Lightroom :: Does 4 Support 10-bit Color
Feb 9, 2013if Lightroom supports 10-bit color. I know it supports ProPhotoRGB and 16-bit image files.
View 5 Repliesif Lightroom supports 10-bit color. I know it supports ProPhotoRGB and 16-bit image files.
View 5 RepliesI'm about to make a significant investment in GPU and monitor if LR5 supports 10-bit color.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI wonder if there's a support for 30 bit color-capable displays (with compatible graphics card and driver, of course...) in Lightroom 4...
I have a NEC PA241W monitor and FirePro 5800 graphics card at my workplace --> which work well with 30 Bit color depth in Adobe PS CS5.0.4.
Since Lightroom 4 requires an "OpenGL 2.0" compatible graphics card it's obvious, that OpenGL is used now (I think LR3 didn't..?). If LR4 is able to handle 30(48) bit color depth(?)
ou have to hover over the image to see the real images. The images embedded in the webpage have their profiles stripped -- just like photoshop does! Interesting.how photoshop doesn't support color profiles in png's.
But now I have a great one.this is with the correct color profile and displays correctly in firefox and probably other browsers -- also displays correctly on windows desktop and in large-icon view.
Ok, grab that image and try to read it into photoshop..I do, and get no warning on profile mismatch like I do on jpg's or tiff's:photoshop strips the existing profile and adds sRGB which isn't the correct profile. This is how photoshop transforms good colors into bad:
Completly screwed up.I have had multiple people notice how my png saved images from photoshop had "off" or bad colors -- usually washed out in comparison w/my monitor profile.I can get 'ok' results if I flatten the image and *convert* my existing profile to sRGB -- and I usually get something that looks 'acceptable'...though the jpg's render in accurate color.
Basically, photoshop can't read or write png web images. and maintain color fidelity unless they have no profile. Even if they have an sRGB profile, I usually get washed out looking pics if I don't strip it but let adobe convert it.
In googling for my own problem, I found references to this problem in Adobe Photoshop going back to 2002.They could fix it with a file plugin for existing CS5-6 users, but it really needs to get fixed and Adobe needs to stop ignoring this problem.I find this extra depressing because I prefer to distribute my pictures losslessly in png, but with photoshop, I'm left with lossy jpegs to get accurate color reproduction.
I'm a GP2 modder and as of now I'm using just PDN for edeting cars and stuff. GP2 has its own pallette of 256 colors.
Is it possible to load a *.pal-file into PDN? And is there a awy to expand the color-pallette shown in the color window? Is it also possible to save .*bmp with one special 256 pallette?
Seen this error message, 'Organizer does not support color space in the file'?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm being a bit premature but when could we possible see support for the Olympus OM-D EM-5?The camera is getting in the hands of the consumer and would love to have LR support it
View 5 Replies View RelatedSome of the main features of Lightroom are reasons for buying it in the first place. Adobe's refusal to support this well known and highly rated camera reveals something about a business model which ignores the needs of their customers. If I buy another camera next year why should I suppose that Adobe will deign to support it?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have LR 4 and now I have bought a Canon 70D. Lightroom said it was unable to interpret the RAW files and directed me to get an update. I have updated to 4.4 and still have the same problem. How can I get my RAW files into Lightroom 4?
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes Lightroom 5.3 FULLY support Canon 70d raw?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI can't finda list of cameras that are supported in LR5. There is a list for LR4but not LR5. In particular I have three cameras that all work withtethering but I don't have any working software to use thisfacility.
Canon G10
Leica DIgilux 2
Both these cameras came with tethering software that was subsequently dissabled in software updates (Not firmware updates)
I also have the EOS-M and for reasons I don'y understand Canon won't let EOS utility operate the camera even though this functionality exists within the camera because CaptureOnesupports EOS-tethering.
I realize that the 60D just came out but I would love to see tether support in LR3.3. I can get it to work using a watched folder with the EOS utility but not with direct tethering.
View 17 Replies View RelatedI am interested in creating a number of HDR prints and am looking for the right software to get.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOr do I have to upgrade to LR4 to work with RAW on 5d mk3?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCurrently, I don't believe Lightroom 5 supports RAW files from Olympus' new camera, the OM-D E-M10.I know it supports JPEG files.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe Canon 6D is not in the current list of supported cameras for tethering in Lightroom. When will Lightroom 4 support tethering for Canon EOS 6D?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen will tethered capture support be avaialble for the D800 and D4?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhen will Adobe LR5 support Fujifilm XT1?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes LR support opengl or opencl?
Using opengl with PS CS6 and PS CC I have seem substantial speed improvements in a number of functions. However, in LR 5 it is getting slower and slower the more images I add. It will often stall/freeze or slow to a crawl. Out of sheer frustration I downloaded Capture One 7 and turned on the opengl support. I imported my entire 1.3 T of image files to C1 7. While it is not as quick as LR - when running as it should - C1 7 never slows down, never stalls, never crashes. I want to continue with LR but its stalls, freezes, slow dows and occassional crashes are killing me.
I have optimized my catalog regularly, put my catalog and previews on my SSD and the cache on a WD Velociraptor - and yet it is getting slower and slower. Both drives are less than 50% full. My images are on a 2t WD Velocirapotor raid 0 - 66% full. Otherwise my system is very quick and very stable - just LR 5 is the probem.
Win 7 pro 64 bit
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 3.3ghz
16 gb ram
By reading comments herein, one is led to believe that LR 5.3 provides tethered capture support for the Nikon D-610. Well, I have a MacBook Pro and OSX, and beg to differ. I cannot, for the life of me, get LR 5.3 to recognize my D-610.
what steps I need to take to get the software to recognize the camera?
If this camera is not supported, when will the D-610 be added? LR 5.3 already supports the 610's predecessor, the D-600; this camera had such a serious dust/sensor problem that Nikon quickly introduced the 610, which is virtually identical but without the sensor problem.
We are thinking about switching over to Lightroom, but 95% of our 60,000 images are EPS files. I recently used a trial version and it didn't seem to recognize my EPS files. Is there a way for Lightroom to acknowledge these files? Is there a plugin to download and try?
View 4 Replies View RelatedDoes LR 3.6 support the new Canon 5D Mark III camera? LR4 should. I don't care if the camera metadata is in LR or not. I just want to process the Mark III images in LR3.6. Can't upgrade to LR 4 because it is only 64 bit.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am a long time user of LR and have the standalone LR4.4 on my Laptop and destop. I have just registered on the cloud for the full pacage and cannot download the LR5 from the cloud as a message comes up saying words to the effect. This platform does not support LR5.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow might I find the list of supported camers for my LR v4.4?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen will LR4 and CS5 support Raw files for 5D MKIII
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am wondering whether there is a chance that Lightroom might work under Vista 64 in the future.
So far I bought all versions of Lightroom and without reading the requirements I bought LR5 as well. Only to discover during installation that Vista 64 is not supported anymore. What a shame! I was really looking forward to LR5, but I do not intend to upgrade the operating system on my still excellent computer. That will render other software useless, which is incompatible with Windows 7 or 8. For now there is no other option than asking a refund. However, I hope there are enough people like me, that will be lost as a LR customer, so that Adobe will rethink its policy.
I downloaded and installed LR 4.3 update to my Mac running OS X 10.8.2. I have no problem importing the RAWs from my Canon 6D by plugging in the SD card into the SD card slot in my MacBook Pro.However it appears that when I try to start tethered capture in LR, my camera keeps saying that it's "BUSY" and won't work at all.I was just wondering does this mean that tethered capture for Canon 6D is not supported in LR 4.3?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI don't see a profile for this camera. I thought it was added but the last profile I see is for the S100.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI am unable to upload .ARW files from the SONY RX1R even after updating to LR4.3. Is there support for these files. If so, what do I need to do?
View 6 Replies View RelatedDoes Lightroom support tethering for the sony RX100?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI know the files are "supported", and will open. However, the quality is quite bad and nowhere near as good as opening the same file in Capture One. Also, long exposure shots see the "black frame" totally discarded and the images are extremely noisy. Phase One support say it's because LR and CS6 are only using a portion of the Raw file and to ask Adobe.
I would migrate to LR5 today if there were a fix or an explanation. Capture One forkflow doesn't suit me. However, the quality is just too bad to accept.