I've taken several shots yesterday evening with intent to create a good panorama. However, I forgot to set my camera exmposure fixed. As a result I've got this:
Is there any automatic way (or helpful tools) to balance the picture and remove those borders or should I edit each shot manually to make them match each other? In other words what is the optimal way to have this problem solved?
i am trialing elements 11 while following how to stich a panorama in digital photo i put in all the amounts on the sliders as it says then it says click on select all then synchronise to move on to the next graph on the disc synchronise is underneath select all on elements 11 there is nothing under select all
these are two photos combined from separate shots to create a panorama. unfortunately, the photographer must have shot the two photos at different times in the day or did some sort of different aperture/shutter speed settings or something, as the exposures are quite different. but it's not just a question of using brightness/contrast... the tone of the two photos are completely off. i've used brightness/contrast and just about when i get the background pretty close, the foreground is way off, and vice-versa. i also tried using adjustments with a gradient map, and selecting different tones, but it still won't do it just right. how to match the tone of the two photos perfectly so it looks like they are one photo, obviously. they need to appear completely continuous.
In CS5 I use Photomerge to produce a panorama. However, how do I create a panorama where there is inadquate overlap between the individual images. CS5 does not have an Interactive layout option permit the movement of images which would then click together. There must a way, only I don't know it. Also in Photomerge if a particular lay option does not work how can I quickly try a different layout option without closing down Photomerge and then opening it up again?
i have created a block with n attribute.i insert the block with attribute filled with fields.I send the commande "Regen" for update field.
Now i want to add a rectangle in the block définition.I use GeometricExtents. it works fine only when then the rotation is 0 and UCS on UCSW.how i can create the line with the 4 points ? I want the line include all entity in my block def.I joined a zip with : 2.dwg is the XRef in 3.dwg
My bloc show info from xref (2.dwg).in the dwg. the bloc contain a line. The libe i manualy added when i create the blockreccord
So I received a whole bunch of contours from an architect. They are lines and arc. big sweeping arcs. Whats the best and fastest way to create a good surface. I can change them globally to a polyline but I need to add vertices like every 5 or 10 feet to get a good surface. Can I select multiple feature lines (after converted) to add vertices?
in CS4 the best that I can get it to do is create a panorama that covers more than the required area and to then do as best I can to crop the result so that the beginning and end match. Is there some automated feature that I am missing that does this?
so I bought the worlds best photo program because I saw videos on Adobe TV showing all the wonderful things it can do, including one in particular where it demonstrated how to create a 360 panorama - woohoo! Imagine my disappointment after installing CS4 when I couldn't find a '3D' menu and discovered that this menu is only in CS4 Extended! What's worse is there is no upgrade path from CS4 to CS4 Extended.
is there a plugin I can buy for Photoshop CS4 that will do the job or are their any other options (bearing in mind I have a v.tight budget after buying PS)?
I think that "auto blend layers>panorama" is assumed to make panoramas from layers ... And, there is also "auto align layers" for making panoramas from layers.
I tried "auto blend layers>panorama" with an image and it can not make a panorama from the two layers trial image ... "auto align layers" can make a panorama easily from the same image.
So, I can see that there is a clear difference between the "auto align layers" and "auto blend layers>panorama" ...
But I could not understand the intention of designers of PS about the usage difference between the "auto align layers" and "auto blend layers>panorama"?
Ive taken a pano ( made from 4 images). The image is very warpped where photos join. Ive tried clone tool to move sections of the image up or down but it doesnt really work too well.how to remove teh distortion from this image, its very clear on the horizon.
Image is no way near finished but gives you an idea of my problem.
Im having trouble with a panorama picture, I have around 10 pics I have to glue togther...all is going fine but the ligthning is very different in the pictures and this results in lines down through the picture...does anybody have a few pointers about something like that...Im thinking about putting some effect/filter on the picture(its for a website) so if you know of a filter ect.
After installing Elements 12 on the MAC (10.8.5) the menu for Photomerge Panorama is greyed out, so Photomerge Panorama cannot be started. Any other Photomerge function is available and can be used.
Is the panorama one of the missing function on MACs?
Import and Exoirt from the File menu are also greyed out.
my setup is: Pentax K20/80-200,2.8 Star ED, dual studio flashes with semitransparent white umbrellas, X-rite color proofing card, CS5, Syncmaster 214T with Spyder2 for calibration and Epson R2400 with all the proper ICC profiles..trying to repro an artwork with many nuances, particulary blue, red and yellow, the red one will show properly. The red gets smeary and too red.
The artwork has a little more of blue in it but that does not show up in the print, just on screen. The difference from screen to paper is too big for my taste (calibrated the day before). I've recently repaired the monitor with better quality capacitors to enhance performance.
I use glossy Epson paper. Also the blue seems to bleed when printed. Resolution of picture is 360dpi as recommended by Epson. I use "keep sharp edges"when enlarging it from the original 240dpi. This has the effect of retaining the colors at least on screen. Sharp image = more pure colors.
I am trying to make a logo. I have it complete but I do not likethat the text looks a little pixilated. I want to make the text look good, in other words make it look High Quality.